Opinion
Argued December 21, 1887
Decided January 17, 1888
J. Stewart Ross for appellant.
James Moffett for respondents.
FINCH, J., reads mem. for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Brophy v. Bartlett
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1888
15 N.E. 75 (N.Y. 1888)
Summaries of
Brophy v. Bartlett
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1888
15 N.E. 75 (N.Y. 1888)
Case details for
Brophy v. Bartlett
Case Details
Full title:JOSEPH BROPHY, Appellant, v . EDWARD B. BARTLETT et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 17, 1888
Citations
15 N.E. 75 (N.Y. 1888)
108 N.Y. 632
13 N.Y. St. Rptr. 490
Citing Cases
Luckie v. Diamond Coal Co.
We hold, therefore, that whether defendant and Foulks were, respectively, master and servant or contractee…
Baldwin v. AbrahamAnd where the question as to the existence of the relation of master and servant is a mixed one of law and…