holding not clearly erroneous the district court's finding that a plan existed for police officers to take alleged shoplifters into custody, such that the store was an actor under color of law
Summary of this case from Glotfelty v. HartNo. 75-931.
February 23, 1976.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 519 F. 2d 93.
holding not clearly erroneous the district court's finding that a plan existed for police officers to take alleged shoplifters into custody, such that the store was an actor under color of law
Summary of this case from Glotfelty v. Hartstating that a discovery motion cannot be used to postpone summary judgment without some showing of relevance
Summary of this case from Kinkead v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Full title:BROOKSHIRE BROS., INC.. ET AL. v. SMITH ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 23, 1976
Rochdale Village, Inc. v. Public Service Employees Union, Local 80, 605 F.2d 1290, 1294-95 (2d Cir. 1979)…
Fontana Aviation, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.it appear[s] from the affidavits of a party opposing the motion that he cannot for reasons stated present by…