From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Rowell

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 16, 1931
133 So. 903 (Ala. 1931)

Opinion

1 Div. 642.

April 16, 1931.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Monroe County; J. S. Williams, Judge.

C. L. Hybart, of Monroeville, for appellant.

The weight of the evidence shows that the collision was due to the negligence of the plaintiff. It was error to refuse charge 2 and also the motion for a new trial. Acts 1927, p. 367.

L. S. Biggs, of Monroeville, for appellee.

Brief did not reach the Reporter.


The action is for damages to plaintiff's automobile resulting from a collision with the automobile of defendant at the intersection of two public highways.

Defendant's refused charge No. 2 seeks to invoke the speed limit provision of subdivision 3, subsec. (b), § 51, Highway Act of 1927, General Acts 1927, p. 367, and its violation as contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff. Its refusal was justified for failure to hypothesize that such negligence "proximately" contributed to the injury.

The evidence presented a clear issue for the jury. No error appears in the court's overruling a motion for new trial on the ground of weight of evidence.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Rowell

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 16, 1931
133 So. 903 (Ala. 1931)
Case details for

Brooks v. Rowell

Case Details

Full title:BROOKS v. ROWELL

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 16, 1931

Citations

133 So. 903 (Ala. 1931)
133 So. 903

Citing Cases

Terry v. Nelms

, 239 Ala. 207, 194 So. 505; Kelly v. Hanwick, 228 Ala. 336, 153 So. 269; Dudley v. Alabama Utilities Serv.…

Dudley v. Alabama Utilities Service Co.

The negligence of the plaintiff to bar his right of recovery must be a concurring proximate cause of the…