From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Harris

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 2, 1950
94 N.E.2d 766 (Mass. 1950)

Opinion

November 2, 1950.

J.B. O'Hare, for the petitioner.

P.A. Chapman, for the respondent Harris.


Decree affirmed. In this petition, brought in the Probate Court by a special administrator, to have determined the title to three accounts in Brookline Savings Bank, Hibernia Savings Bank, and Eliot Savings Bank, respectively, the petitioner has appealed from a final decree adjudging that the respondent Harris is the owner of these accounts. The evidence, which is reported, justified a finding by the judge that on September 22, 1947, the petitioner's intestate, John F. Houlton, made a completed gift of these accounts to Harris, his son-in-law. Houlton arranged for the transfer of the accounts into the name of Harris and new bank books were issued and delivered to him. American Employers' Ins. Co. v. Webster, 322 Mass. 161. The judge was not plainly wrong in failing to infer and find, as contended by the petitioner, that such transfer was colorable and intended by the intestate to prevent an attachment by his wife in a libel brought by her for divorce. See Doane v. Doane, 238 Mass. 106; Kerwin v. Donaghy, 317 Mass. 559; National Shawmut Bank v. Cumming, 325 Mass. 457.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Harris

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 2, 1950
94 N.E.2d 766 (Mass. 1950)
Case details for

Brooks v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:HENRY E. BROOKS, administrator, vs. JOHN F. HARRIS others

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Nov 2, 1950

Citations

94 N.E.2d 766 (Mass. 1950)
94 N.E.2d 766

Citing Cases

Vogel v. Shaw

Seymour v. Oelrichs, (Cal.) 106 P. 88, 10 R.C.L. 833; Conley v. Johnson, (Ark.) 64 S.W. 277; McDowell v.…

Reel v. Combes

" We also cite Yates v. Donaldson, 5 Md. 389, 61 Am. Dec., 283; Harris v. Brooks, 21 Pick., (Mass.), 195, 32…