From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Francis

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Mar 15, 1984
728 F.2d 1358 (11th Cir. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-8028.

March 15, 1984.

Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

Mary Beth Westmoreland, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, J. Robert Elliot, Judge.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion September 15, 1983, 11th Cir., 1983, 716 F.2d 780).


A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Francis

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Mar 15, 1984
728 F.2d 1358 (11th Cir. 1984)
Case details for

Brooks v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ANTHONY BROOKS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ROBERT FRANCIS, WARDEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Mar 15, 1984

Citations

728 F.2d 1358 (11th Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

Brooks v. Kemp

The panel declined to grant relief on any of these six issues. Brooks v. Francis, 716 F.2d 780 (11th Cir.…

Tucker v. Kemp

The panel affirmed the district court's denial of relief on issues (1) and (3) above, and also on Tucker's…