From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bronner v. Marsh

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 9, 2021
Civil Action 20-cv-2656 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 20-cv-2656

06-09-2021

JAZS BOND BRONNER, Petitioner, v. RICHARD MARSH, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

BERLE M. SCHILLER, J.

AND NOW, this 9th day of June, 2021, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED.

3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Bronner v. Marsh

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 9, 2021
Civil Action 20-cv-2656 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Bronner v. Marsh

Case Details

Full title:JAZS BOND BRONNER, Petitioner, v. RICHARD MARSH, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 20-cv-2656 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 9, 2021)

Citing Cases

H.C. v. Chudzik

In Bronner, a habeas petitioner claimed he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel…