finding evidence of three less qualified female professors receiving tenure over male professor insufficient to establish prima facie case of reverse gender discrimination
Summary of this case from Vianes v. Tulsa Educare, Inc.No. 99-1236.
June 27, 2000.
D.Colo.; Appealing after remand 140 F.3d 1335.
Affirmed
finding evidence of three less qualified female professors receiving tenure over male professor insufficient to establish prima facie case of reverse gender discrimination
Summary of this case from Vianes v. Tulsa Educare, Inc.affirming an award of summary judgment dismissing a Title VII claim for race discrimination where the plaintiff relied on inadmissible hearsay in its opposition to summary judgment
Summary of this case from Payan v. United Parcel Serv.reversing when the ALJ's RFC assessment was not specific enough: "The ALJ's finding that claimant would have to change positions from time to time to relieve his symptomatology is equally vague."
Summary of this case from Fairley v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.rejecting argument that the ALJ failed to consider whether lack of medical treatment was due to insufficient funds where there was no evidence that plaintiff sought medical treatment “but was refused for an inability to pay”
Summary of this case from Akram K. v. Kijakaziexercising discretion and remanding for immediate award of benefits where ALJ erred in rejecting treating physician's opinion that claimant essentially had no capacity to sit, and where reviewing court determined that sitting limitation was supported by substantial evidence and determined that ALJ would be unable to sustain his step-five burden of identifying sedentary jobs that claimant could perform if case were remanded
Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. Saulremanding for immediate award of benefits where ALJ erred in rejecting claimant's treating source evidence regarding claimant's capacity for sitting and holding that ALJ would be unable to sustain his step-five burden of identifying sedentary jobs that claimant could perform if case were remanded
Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. Saulnoting that a complete consultative examination report calls for an RFC
Summary of this case from Sandoval v. Colvindiscussing pro se plaintiff's obligation to comply with local rules and affirming the district court's striking of late response and grant of summary judgment
Summary of this case from Harper v. City of Cortezexplaining that "the standard for judging a substantive due process claim is whether the challenged government action would 'shock the conscience of federal judges'"
Summary of this case from Unal v. L. Alamos Pub. Sch.discussing Petitioner's parole violations and revocation
Summary of this case from Azure v. Craigstating that in order to survive summary judgment on a conspiracy claim plaintiff must furnish genuine factual basis to support defining elements of a conspiracy — agreement and concerted action
Summary of this case from Miranda v. Statestating that to prevail on substantive due process claim, professor whose employment was terminated must "satisfy the shock the conscience standard" and to do so "must do more than show that the government actor intentionally or recklessly caused injury to the plaintiff by abusing or misusing government power. . . . Rather, a plaintiff must demonstrate a degree of outrageousness and a magnitude of potential or actual harm that is truly conscience shocking."
Summary of this case from Montgomery v. State of New Mexicodismissing remark that manager commented that poor old black woman wants to learn as a stray remark
Summary of this case from Ellison v. Sandia National LaboratoriesFull title:Bronk v. Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Jun 27, 2000
"A different standard is applied to reverse sex discrimination claims because there is no reason to presume…
Sandoval v. ColvinThus, a complete consultative examination report should include the medical source's observations and…