From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brock v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Supreme Court of California
Jul 28, 1938
11 Cal.2d 781 (Cal. 1938)

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 16674.

July 28, 1938.

APPLICATION for a writ of prohibition to restrain the Superior Court of Los Angeles County from proceeding with an injunction suit. Writ denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Attorney-General, for Petitioner.

Mark M. Cohen, Irwin M. Fulop and Victor Ford Collins for Respondents.


THE COURT.

This proceeding to prohibit the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, and the judge thereof, from taking any action in an injunction suit brought against the director of agriculture, except to dissolve the temporary injunction issued in said action, is in all respects, except as to the names of the parties plaintiff in said injunction suit, like action S.F. No. 15994 this day decided and reported ante, p. 682 [ 81 P.2d 931]. [1] In that case we denied the petition for the writ of prohibition for reasons stated in our opinion in said proceeding. For the same reasons, and upon the authority of our decision in said proceeding, the present petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.


Summaries of

Brock v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Supreme Court of California
Jul 28, 1938
11 Cal.2d 781 (Cal. 1938)
Case details for

Brock v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Case Details

Full title:A.A. BROCK, as Director of Agriculture, etc., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 28, 1938

Citations

11 Cal.2d 781 (Cal. 1938)
81 P.2d 934

Citing Cases

Slivkoff v. Board of Trustees

( Whitcomb Hotel v. California Emp. Com., supra; Hodge v. McCall (1921) 185 Cal. 330, 334 [ 197 P. 86]; Boone…

People ex rel. Department of Public Works v. Bosio

( Whitcomb Hotel v. California Emp. Com., supra; Hodge v. McCall (1921) 185 Cal. 330, 334 [ 197 P. 86]; Boone…