From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broad v. Patico Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1997
243 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 6, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The infant plaintiff, Gary Broad, was sitting on the floor of a classroom in the defendant's nursery school when another child knocked a toy block from a bookshelf, causing the block to strike Gary in the face. He sought to recover damages from the school on the ground of negligent supervision. "`It is well established that a school is not the insurer of the safety of the students and it is only under a duty to exercise the degree of reasonable care that a parent of ordinary prudence would have exercised under comparable circumstances ( see, Ohman v Board of Educ., 300 N.Y. 306). When an injury results from the act of an intervening third party which, under the circumstances, could hardly have been anticipated in the reasonable exercise of the school's legal duty to the child, there can be no liability on the part of the school'" ( Ceglia v. Portledge School, 187 A.D.2d 550, quoting Hauser v. North Rockland Cent. School Dist. No. 1, 166 A.D.2d 553, 554).

The school was entitled to summary judgment because no triable issue of fact was presented as to the school's liability for this spontaneous and unanticipated act ( see, e.g., Hauser v. North Rockland Cent. School Dist. No. 1, supra).

Miller, J.P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Broad v. Patico Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1997
243 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Broad v. Patico Corporation

Case Details

Full title:GARY BROAD, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, GAIL BROAD, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 809

Citing Cases

Singh v. Persaud

nfant plaintiff and several other children in her home, was not an insurer of the children entrusted to her…

Schleef v. Riverhead Cent. Sch. Dist

The defendants established, prima facie, that they properly supervised the infant plaintiff and that, in any…