From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Britto v. Dist. Ct.

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
Oct 26, 1971
489 P.2d 1304 (Colo. 1971)

Opinion

No. 25303

Decided October 26, 1971.

Original proceeding for writ of prohibition. Rule to show cause issued.

Rule Made Absolute

Larry V. Johnson, for petitioners.

Jarvis W. Secombe, District Attorney, Second Judicial District, Coleman M. Connolly, Deputy, Kathie L. Blackman, Deputy, for respondents.


Rule to show cause directed to the Respondents herein was issued and in response thereto the District Attorney of the City and County of Denver, appearing for the Respondents, has confessed that the District Court does not have jurisdiction over the particular offenses charged and that proper venue is in Jefferson County.

The rule is made absolute.


Summaries of

Britto v. Dist. Ct.

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
Oct 26, 1971
489 P.2d 1304 (Colo. 1971)
Case details for

Britto v. Dist. Ct.

Case Details

Full title:Phil. A. Britto and Vernon L. McKim v. District Court in and for the City…

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc

Date published: Oct 26, 1971

Citations

489 P.2d 1304 (Colo. 1971)
489 P.2d 1304

Citing Cases

Camino et al. v. Lewis

The code requires the defendants either to demur or answer, and in their answer they are allowed to set up as…

Silverman v. Silverman

evidence is conclusive. Cromwell v. County of Sac., 94 U.S. 361, 24 L.Ed. 195; Southern Pacific Co. v. United…