From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brinson v. McCotter

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1921
106 S.E. 215 (N.C. 1921)

Opinion

(Filed 16 March, 1921.)

Appeal and Error — Parties — Case Remanded.

A case on appeal will be remanded to make additional parties, when they appear from the agreed case to be necessary for a proper determination of the controversy.

APPEAL by defendant from Bond, J., from PAMLICO, 30 December, 1920.

Small, MacLean, Bragaw Rodman for plaintiffs.

Z. V. Rawls for defendant.


This is an action to settle the title to a tract of land, submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, and it appearing that there cannot be a complete determination of the rights of the parties in the absence of the heirs of Ellis H. Pickles, it is ordered that the cause be remanded to the Superior Court in order that the said heirs be made parties to this action with the right to plead, or if so advised, they may make themselves parties in this Court and adopt the agreed statement of facts.


Summaries of

Brinson v. McCotter

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1921
106 S.E. 215 (N.C. 1921)
Case details for

Brinson v. McCotter

Case Details

Full title:F. C. BRINSON ET AL. v. S. McCOTTER AND WIFE

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1921

Citations

106 S.E. 215 (N.C. 1921)
106 S.E. 215

Citing Cases

Wagoner v. Saintsing

But the living daughters of Jacob Wagoner, and the heirs of such as have died, are necessary, or, at least,…

Peel v. Moore

In the following cases of controversies without action involving title to land, when it appeared to us there…