From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bridges Financial Group v. Beech Hill Company

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Apr 18, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-2686 (D.N.J. Apr. 18, 2011)

Summary

granting motion for default judgment but deferring judgment on damages pending supplemental filings from the plaintiff as to requested amounts where the plaintiff did "not specify how interest was calculated or the provision in the loan agreement that authorizes attorneys' fees"

Summary of this case from Tierpoint, LLC v. Gibraltar, LLC

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-2686.

April 18, 2011


ORDER


This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 87) against Defendant Thomas J. Ernst, as well as Mr. Ernst's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 80) the case pursuant to N.J. Stat. Ann. § 14A: 13-20; and it appearing that Mr. Ernst's bankruptcy action has been dismissed, see In re: Thomas John Ernst, Bankr. No. 11-15669-MS, Doc. No. 16 (Bankr. D.N.J. Mar. 25, 2011); and this Court having considered the parties' submissions and decided the motions without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78; and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion;

IT IS THIS 18th day of April, 2011,

ORDERED that the bankruptcy stay recognized by this Court's Order of March 15, 2011 (Doc. No. 96) is hereby LIFTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Mr. Ernst's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 80) is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Mr. Ernst (Doc. No. 87) is GRANTED. The Court will permit Plaintiff to file supplemental documentation regarding its claim for interest and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs no later than April 25, 2011. Mr. Ernst may file a responsive submission, limited to addressing Plaintiff's claim for interest and attorneys' fees and costs, no later than May 2, 2011.


Summaries of

Bridges Financial Group v. Beech Hill Company

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Apr 18, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-2686 (D.N.J. Apr. 18, 2011)

granting motion for default judgment but deferring judgment on damages pending supplemental filings from the plaintiff as to requested amounts where the plaintiff did "not specify how interest was calculated or the provision in the loan agreement that authorizes attorneys' fees"

Summary of this case from Tierpoint, LLC v. Gibraltar, LLC

permitting the plaintiff to file supplemental documentation regarding its claim for interest and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs

Summary of this case from Int'l Union of Painters & Allied Trades Dist. Council 711 Health & Welfare v. Mazzco Enters., Inc.

entering default judgment notwithstanding defendant's pro se status

Summary of this case from Rios v. Loves

permitting the plaintiff to "file supplemental documentation regarding its claim for interest and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs"

Summary of this case from Ibew Local 351 Pension Fund v. George Sparks, Inc.

permitting the plaintiff to "file supplemental documentation regarding its claim for interest and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs"

Summary of this case from Doe v. Tobi Simone

permitting the plaintiff to "file supplemental documentation regarding its claim for interest and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs"

Summary of this case from Basara v. CBRL Grp., Inc.

permitting the plaintiff to "file supplemental documentation regarding its claim for interest and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs"

Summary of this case from Mancuso v. Tyler Dane, LLC

permitting the plaintiff to "file supplemental documentation regarding its claim for interest and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs"

Summary of this case from Nieves v. Top Notch Granite Marble LLC
Case details for

Bridges Financial Group v. Beech Hill Company

Case Details

Full title:THE BRIDGES FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. BEECH HILL COMPANY, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Apr 18, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-2686 (D.N.J. Apr. 18, 2011)

Citing Cases

United States v. Sanchez

The Court considers: (1) whether the defaulting party has a meritorious defense; (2) the prejudice suffered…

United States v. Chandler

The Court considers: (1) whether the defaulting party has a meritorious defense; (2) the prejudice suffered…