From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brewster v. Johnson

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1876
51 Cal. 222 (Cal. 1876)

Opinion

         Appeal from the County Court, County of Santa Barbara.

         The plaintiff recovered judgment, and the defendant appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         Chas. E. Huse, for the Appellant.

         W. M. Francis, for the Respondent.


         OPINION          By the Court:

         The court below erred in permitting the original complaint to be read as evidence against the plaintiff. (Mecham v. McKay , 37 Cal. 154.) It is the rule, well settled here, that an error against the appellant being shown, injury to him is presumed, and that it devolves upon the respondent in such a case to show that no injury has in fact been wrought. In the condition of the record of this case, we are not satisfied that no injury was done the appellant by the error adverted to.

         Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Brewster v. Johnson

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1876
51 Cal. 222 (Cal. 1876)
Case details for

Brewster v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:J. A. BREWSTER v. J. A. JOHNSON

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1876

Citations

51 Cal. 222 (Cal. 1876)

Citing Cases

Meyer v. State Board of Equalization

[7a] By a long line of decisions, it is established in this state that such a pleading is not admissible as…

Williams v. Seiglitz

2. In support of his contention that the original answer was improperly admitted as a part of his…