From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brennan et Als. v. Biber

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Feb 19, 1968
99 N.J. Super. 247 (App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

Argued February 5, 1968 —

Decided February 19, 1968.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.

Mr. Daniel Crystal argued the cause for appellants ( Messrs. Cohn Lifland, attorneys).

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for respondent Henry Biber ( Messrs. Jung, Selikoff, Rathman Dwyer, attorneys).


The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Kole's opinion reported at 93 N.J. Super. 351 ( Law Div. 1966).

Additionally, we dispose of a point not specifically discussed in the reported opinion. Plaintiffs contend that certain evidence rulings by the trial court and comments of the court generally relating thereto had the effect of removing from jury consideration important aspects of the injury claim of Sean Brennan. The record does not support the contention. Moreover, in its charge, the court clearly pointed out to the jury that there was a testimonial conflict with respect to these matters which required jury determination.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Brennan et Als. v. Biber

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Feb 19, 1968
99 N.J. Super. 247 (App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Brennan et Als. v. Biber

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK BRENNAN, BRIAN BRENNAN AND SEAN BRENNAN, INFANTS BY THEIR GUARDIAN…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Feb 19, 1968

Citations

99 N.J. Super. 247 (App. Div. 1968)
239 A.2d 261

Citing Cases

Siciliano v. Capitol City Shows, Inc.

First, many courts have been more willing to protect the relationship between husband and wife than that…

Michaels v. Nemethvargo

At that time, the following cases had not permitted this cause of action: Smith v. Richardson, 171 So.2d 96…