From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braxton v. Conway

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 11, 2008
Civ. No. 9:05-CV-191 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2008)

Opinion

Civ. No. 9:05-CV-191 (TJM/RFT).

September 11, 2008


DECISION ORDER


This pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 was referred to the Hon. Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report-Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.4.

No objections to the Report-Recommendation and Order dated May 22, 2008 have been filed. Furthermore, after examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein. It is therefore

ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED. Further, because Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), no certificate of appealability will issue with respect to any of Petitioner's claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Braxton v. Conway

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 11, 2008
Civ. No. 9:05-CV-191 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Braxton v. Conway

Case Details

Full title:TERRY S. BRAXTON, Petitioner, v. JAMES T. CONWAY, Superintendent…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Sep 11, 2008

Citations

Civ. No. 9:05-CV-191 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2008)

Citing Cases

Alvarez v. Yelich

" People v. Alvarez. 57 A.D.3d at 688. Courts in this circuit have consistently held that a petitioner's…