From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brawley v. Shoals Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
Feb 8, 2013
Civil Action Number 3:12-cv-2713-JEO (N.D. Ala. Feb. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action Number 3:12-cv-2713-JEO

02-08-2013

CHRISTOPHER BRAWLEY, Plaintiff, v. SHOALS HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On January 8, 2013, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. Neither party has filed any objections.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that Defendant CIGNA, otherwise known as Connecticut Health and Life Insurance Company of North America's, motion to dismiss be GRANTED. Accordingly this action is DISMISSED against Defendant CIGNA. This action shall proceed against the remaining defendant, Shoals Hospital.

________________________

ABDUL K. KALLON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brawley v. Shoals Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
Feb 8, 2013
Civil Action Number 3:12-cv-2713-JEO (N.D. Ala. Feb. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Brawley v. Shoals Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER BRAWLEY, Plaintiff, v. SHOALS HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 8, 2013

Citations

Civil Action Number 3:12-cv-2713-JEO (N.D. Ala. Feb. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

Howell v. Bank of Am., N.A. (In re Dorsey)

As discussed previously, the “incorporation by reference doctrine” authorizes the Court to consider the Trust…