From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brannon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 31, 1939
137 Tex. Crim. 186 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)

Summary

holding that testimony that the defendant and his wife "went to cursing" and "started to fight and curse" before the defendant killed her was not sufficient to warrant a jury instruction on mutual combat

Summary of this case from Williams v. State

Opinion

No. 20421.

May 31, 1939.

Appeal Dismissed — Jurisdiction.

Where the record failed to show any notice of appeal, Court of Criminal Appeals was without jurisdiction and dismissal of appeal was required.

Appeal from District Court of Denton County. Hon. B. W. Boyd, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for operating a motor vehicle on the highway while intoxicated; penalty, fine of $50, and five days in the county jail.

Appeal dismissed.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Conviction is for operating a motor vehicle on the highway while the operator was intoxicated, punishment being by fine of fifty dollars and five days in the county jail.

The record fails to show any notice of appeal in the absence of which this Court has no jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Brannon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 31, 1939
137 Tex. Crim. 186 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)

holding that testimony that the defendant and his wife "went to cursing" and "started to fight and curse" before the defendant killed her was not sufficient to warrant a jury instruction on mutual combat

Summary of this case from Williams v. State

holding that testimony that the defendant and his wife "went to cursing" and "started to fight and curse" before the defendant killed her was not sufficient to warrant a jury instruction on mutual combat

Summary of this case from Williams v. State
Case details for

Brannon v. State

Case Details

Full title:H. L. BRANNON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 31, 1939

Citations

137 Tex. Crim. 186 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)
128 S.W.2d 1176

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Evidence that Appellant and Karim were arguing shortly before he shot her did not support a jury instruction…

Williams v. State

Evidence that Appellant and Karim were arguing shortly before he shot her did not support a jury instruction…