From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branning v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 13, 2007
372 Ark. 45 (Ark. 2007)

Opinion


269 S.W.3d 813 (Ark. 2007) 372 Ark. 45 Christopher BRANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 07-789. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 13, 2007

         Motion to Compel Completion of the Record.          James Winfield Wyatt, Little Rock, AR, for appellant.

          Dustin McDaniel, Att'y Gen., by David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, AR, for appellee.

          PER CURIAM.

          The attorney for appellant has filed this motion to compel completion of the record in this appeal. He states that the record has not been completed due to grave illness of the court reporter. The State responds and states that finding another reporter to complete the transcript would be appropriate, see Whitten v. State, 332 Ark. 373, 373-74, 965 S.W.2d 124 (1998) ( per curiam ), a solution the circuit judge's office has already begun to pursue.

         We grant appellant's motion and order that the court reporter's tapes be released for transcription, and, if necessary, certification by another reporter.


Summaries of

Branning v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 13, 2007
372 Ark. 45 (Ark. 2007)
Case details for

Branning v. State

Case Details

Full title:Christopher BRANNING v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 13, 2007

Citations

372 Ark. 45 (Ark. 2007)
372 Ark. 45