From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brann Stuart Co. v. Consolidated Sun Ray

U.S.
Oct 13, 1969
396 U.S. 840 (1969)

Summary

applying exclusionary rule to administrative proceedings before liquor authority with respect to imposition of penalties on license holders

Summary of this case from City of Omaha v. Savard-Henson

Opinion

No. 365.

October 13, 1969, OCTOBER TERM, 1969.


Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Fred M. Vinson, Jr., for petitioner. Morris Wolf for respondent. Reported below: 433 Pa. 574, 253 A. 2d 105.


Summaries of

Brann Stuart Co. v. Consolidated Sun Ray

U.S.
Oct 13, 1969
396 U.S. 840 (1969)

applying exclusionary rule to administrative proceedings before liquor authority with respect to imposition of penalties on license holders

Summary of this case from City of Omaha v. Savard-Henson
Case details for

Brann Stuart Co. v. Consolidated Sun Ray

Case Details

Full title:BRANN STUART CO. v. CONSOLIDATED SUN RAY, INC

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 13, 1969

Citations

396 U.S. 840 (1969)

Citing Cases

United States v. Stribling

"* * * [T]he information that a taxpayer's returns are under audit gives notice of the possibility of…

United States v. Prudden

An exhaustive collection of such authorities is set out in United States v. Squeri, 398 F.2d 785, 789-790 (2d…