From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branigin v. Duddleston

U.S.
May 20, 1968
391 U.S. 364 (1968)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA.

No. 1252.

Decided May 20, 1968.

Together with No. 1263, Summers v. Duddleston et al., also on appeal from the same court.

284 F. Supp. 176, affirmed.

John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Charles S. White for appellants in No. 1252. Marshall F. Kizer for appellant in No. 1263.

Leslie Duvall and William H. Sparrenberger for appellees in both cases.



The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 ( 390 U.S. 932, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court's judgment, also acquiesces in the Court's affirmance of that judgment.


Summaries of

Branigin v. Duddleston

U.S.
May 20, 1968
391 U.S. 364 (1968)
Case details for

Branigin v. Duddleston

Case Details

Full title:BRANIGIN ET AL. v . DUDDLESTON ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 20, 1968

Citations

391 U.S. 364 (1968)

Citing Cases

United States v. Brian Ganos, Mark Spindler, Sonag Co.

It said, "[i]n Rakas, this Court held that an illegal search only violates the rights of those who have 'a…

Smith v. Clark

" There is, however, one lower federal court case that has addressed the question, Grills v. Branigin, 284 F.…