From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brandt v. Brown Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 16, 1996
100 F.3d 942 (2d Cir. 1996)

Summary

finding no Brady violation where undisclosed matter was unrelated to defendant and had been resolved prior to defendant's trial

Summary of this case from United States v. Teman

Opinion

No. 95-7549.

January 16, 1996.

Appeal from S.D.N.Y.


Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

Brandt v. Brown Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 16, 1996
100 F.3d 942 (2d Cir. 1996)

finding no Brady violation where undisclosed matter was unrelated to defendant and had been resolved prior to defendant's trial

Summary of this case from United States v. Teman

rejecting the argument that reports must be made to the same judge who issued the wiretap

Summary of this case from United States v. Guillen

rejecting the argument that reports must be made to the same judge who issued the wiretap

Summary of this case from United States v. Guillen

stating that “speed and efficiency ... are the goals of arbitration”

Summary of this case from Christensen v. Nauman
Case details for

Brandt v. Brown Co.

Case Details

Full title:Brandt v. Brown and Co. Securities Corp

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 16, 1996

Citations

100 F.3d 942 (2d Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Patsy's Brand, Inc. v. I.O.B. Realty, Inc.

Second, Defendants ignored the well-established safe distance rule-that “an injunction impose[s] a heavier…

In re Moran Enterprises Corp.

Despite the holding in Kinsman, the Second Circuit and other District Courts in this Circuit have…