From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brands v. Cassedy

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 21, 1939
5 A.2d 685 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Submitted February term, 1939.

Decided April 21st, 1939.

On appeal from the court of chancery, whose opinion is reported in 124 N.J. Eq. 417.

Mr. George C. Winne, for the defendants-appellants.

Mr. Claude E. Cook, for the complainant-respondent.


We have carefully examined the pleading and proofs in this case, the arguments of counsel and the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor, and we are of the opinion that his conclusions as to the facts and his application of the law thereto were in all respects proper.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Brands v. Cassedy

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 21, 1939
5 A.2d 685 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

Brands v. Cassedy

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET A. BRANDS, complainant-respondent, v. FLORENCE E. CASSEDY, CLARK…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 21, 1939

Citations

5 A.2d 685 (N.J. 1939)
5 A.2d 685

Citing Cases

Wujciak v. Wujciak

37 C.J.S., Statute of Frauds,726, § 225. This construction has been followed in our courts without discussion…

Goodpasture v. Goodpasture

An oral agreement not to partition interests in real property is not a defense since it is affected by the…