From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brand v. Brand

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 6, 1979
259 S.E.2d 133 (Ga. 1979)

Opinion

34926.

ARGUED MAY 15, 1979.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 6, 1979.

Custody of children. Newton Superior Court. Before Judge Ellis.

William A. Wehunt, for appellant.

Ballard, Ozburn Stephenson, Samuel D. Ozburn, for appellee.


A rule nisi may be used by the trial court to give notice of a permanent child custody hearing notwithstanding the practice that a rule nisi is more often used to give notice of preliminary, temporary or other interlocutory hearings. See Herring v. Standard Guaranty Ins. Co., 238 Ga. 261, 262 ( 232 S.E.2d 544) (1977). After the time for filing defense pleadings expires, it is not error for such hearing to be set by rule nisi less than 30 days hence, as the time for trial is set by Code Ann. § 81A-140 (a), not Code Ann. § 81A-156 (c) as contended by appellant's counsel.

The trial judge found that it was in the best interests of the children that custody be awarded to the father. There is evidence to support that award. Gazaway v. Brackett, 241 Ga. 127, 128 ( 244 S.E.2d 238) (1978); Anderson v. Anderson, 240 Ga. 795 ( 242 S.E.2d 593) (1978).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


ARGUED MAY 15, 1979 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 6, 1979.


Summaries of

Brand v. Brand

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 6, 1979
259 S.E.2d 133 (Ga. 1979)
Case details for

Brand v. Brand

Case Details

Full title:BRAND v. BRAND

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 6, 1979

Citations

259 S.E.2d 133 (Ga. 1979)
259 S.E.2d 133

Citing Cases

Wrightson v. Wrightson

As there is evidence to support the award of permanent custody to the father, the trial court did not abuse…

Smith v. National Bank

While it is true that a rule nisi is generally used to notify parties of and compel them to appear at…