From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Braelow v. Schlesinger

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 5, 1933
163 A. 664 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Decided January 5th, 1933.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Mr. Jacob L. Newman ( Mr. Lionel P. Kristeller and Mr. Saul J. Zucker, of counsel), for the appellant.

Mr. Philip J. Schotland, for the respondent.


The decree in the event below will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in 109 N.J. Eq. 472.

We have noticed a slight misstatement of fact in the opinion which does not at all affect the result.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Braelow v. Schlesinger

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 5, 1933
163 A. 664 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

Braelow v. Schlesinger

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH C. BRAELOW et al., complainants, v. LOUIS SCHLESINGER…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 5, 1933

Citations

163 A. 664 (N.J. 1933)
163 A. 664

Citing Cases

De Benedictis v. Gerechoff

This situation is analogous to those cases where one broker sues another for a share of commissions after an…

Alnor Construction Co. v. Herchet

This rule rests upon general usage; and it may be modified or superseded by a special usage in relation to…