From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. P.U.C.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 8, 1932
125 Ohio St. 381 (Ohio 1932)

Opinion

No. 23536

Decided June 8, 1932.

Public Utilities Commission — Motor transportation companies — Routing interstate operation over less congested highways.

ERROR to the Public Utilities Commission.

Messrs. M.B. H.H. Johnson, Mr. La Rue Brown. Mr. John T. Scott and Mr. Robert W. Wheeler, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Gilbert Bettman, attorney general, and Mr. Thomas J. Herbert, for defendant in error.


This case is but slightly different in its facts from the case of Motor Transport Truck Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, ante, 374, 181 N.E. 665, this day decided. The same questions of law are presented, and upon the authorities cited and the reasons stated in that case the order of the commission herein is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bradley v. P.U.C.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 8, 1932
125 Ohio St. 381 (Ohio 1932)
Case details for

Bradley v. P.U.C.

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY, D. B. A. WOLVERINE MOTOR FREIGHT LINES v. PUBLIC UTILITIES…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 8, 1932

Citations

125 Ohio St. 381 (Ohio 1932)
181 N.E. 668

Citing Cases

Bradley v. Pub. Util. Comm'n

In dealing with the problem of safety of the highways, as in other problems of motor transportation, the…

Holly v. Indus. Comm

"2. Motor transportation companies operating in interstate traffic are subject to the provisions of said…