From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradley v. Henry

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 15, 2005
432 F.3d 938 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

No. 04-15919.

December 15, 2005.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Harry L. Hupp, J. D.C. No. CV-03-03034-PJH.

Dennis P. Riordan, Esq., Riordan Horgan, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Morris Beatus, Esq., Bridget Billeter, Esq., AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.


Summaries of

Bradley v. Henry

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 15, 2005
432 F.3d 938 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

Bradley v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:Nicole BRADLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gloria HENRY, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 15, 2005

Citations

432 F.3d 938 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

State v. Sam

The Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, concluded that the defendant's injury was not a structural error but was…

People v. Perry

( Id. at p. 820.) Thereafter, the Ninth Circuit granted a rehearing en banc ( Bradley v. Henry (9th Cir.…