From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bradford National Bank v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Illinois
Feb 17, 1938
13 N.E.2d 267 (Ill. 1938)

Opinion

No. 24447. Cause transferred.

Opinion filed February 17, 1938.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Bond county; the Hon. ALFRED D. RIESS, Judge, presiding.

MATHENY WELKER, for appellants.

J.H. ALLIO, and MEYER MEYER, for appellee.


The Bradford National Bank of Greenville, a judgment creditor of defendants Armoni J. Floyd and Emma A. Floyd, filed a bill in the circuit court of Bond county to set aside a real estate mortgage made by these defendants to their children, Areta Wisnasky and Harold M. Floyd, to have plaintiff's judgment decreed to be a superior lien to the mortgage, and to have the sheriff sell the land. The grounds set forth in the complaint are that the mortgage was fraudulently made to hinder and delay plaintiff in collecting its judgment and was without good or sufficient consideration. From a judgment for plaintiff the defendants have appealed directly to this court.

There is no question in this case which gives this court jurisdiction. No freehold is directly involved in a suit by a judgment creditor to set aside a fraudulent conveyance made by a debtor and to subject the conveyed land to the payment of the judgment. (Willson v. Labhart, 350 Ill. 165; Coutre v. Ermel, 315 id. 361; Fairbanks v. Carle, 217 id. 136; First Nat. Bank v. Vest, 187 id. 389; Hupp v. Hupp, 153 id. 490.) That rule applies to this case.

The cause is transferred to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District.

Cause transferred.


Summaries of

Bradford National Bank v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Illinois
Feb 17, 1938
13 N.E.2d 267 (Ill. 1938)
Case details for

Bradford National Bank v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:THE BRADFORD NATIONAL BANK OF GREENVILLE, Appellee, vs. ARMONI J. FLOYD et…

Court:Supreme Court of Illinois

Date published: Feb 17, 1938

Citations

13 N.E.2d 267 (Ill. 1938)
13 N.E.2d 267

Citing Cases

Town of North Hempstead v. Gregory

The facts must be of greater uniformity and common to a broader territory. ( Buffalo Pipe Line Co. v. N.Y.,…

Snadon et al. v. Jones and Nichols

Cluett v. Union Electric Light Power Co., 205 S.W. 72, 220 S.W. 865; Wecker v. Grafeman-McIntosh, 326 Mo.…