From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyls v. Wirtz

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 25, 1965
352 F.2d 63 (5th Cir. 1965)

Opinion

No. 21873.

October 25, 1965.

Frederic Johnson, Sinton, Tex., for appellant.

Bessie Margolin, Associate Sol., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., Earl Street, Regional Atty., Dept. of Labor, Dallas, Tex., William Fauver, Atty., Dept. of Labor, Charles Donahue, Sol. of Labor, Helen B. Willette, Atty., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before BROWN and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and MORGAN, District Judge.


Appellant is engaged in the aerial crop dusting business. He maintains an office, hangar and warehouse at the Municipal Airport in Sinton, Texas. There were numerous employees working at this location. None but the airplane pilot and flagman ever went upon the farm in the performance of the functions of the business.

The Wages and Hours Division of the Department of Labor agreed that the pilot and the flagman were exempt from the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, but contended that the employees at the office, hangar and warehouse who never went upon the farm were covered. Appellant claimed exemption of these employees under the provisions of Section 13(a)(6) of the Act. The District Court denied exemption for all employees other than the pilot and the flagmen.

In Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company v. McComb, 337 U.S. 755, 69 S.Ct. 1274, 93 L.Ed. 1672 (1949) it was held that the exemptions of Section 13(a)(6) apply only to work performed by a farmer or on a farm. This disposes of the question raised in this appeal.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Boyls v. Wirtz

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 25, 1965
352 F.2d 63 (5th Cir. 1965)
Case details for

Boyls v. Wirtz

Case Details

Full title:O.C. BOYLS, doing business as Boyls Dusting and Spraying Service…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Oct 25, 1965

Citations

352 F.2d 63 (5th Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

Tipton v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.

While the circumstances at bar make this case clearly distinguishable from Holtville, it is believed that the…

Sariol v. Florida

Flying a crop-dusting airplane, cooking for field workers, or even clerical work can be considered…