From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyle Ice-Machine Co. v. Gould

Supreme Court of California
Jul 27, 1887
73 Cal. 153 (Cal. 1887)

Opinion

         Department Two

         Hearing in Bank denied.

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.

         COUNSEL:

         William Hoff Cook, for Appellant.

          Bicknell & White, and Chapman & Hendricks, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         THE COURT           [14 P. 610] We find no error in the record. The demurrer to the answer of Cook, special administrator, was properly sustained. The defendant occupied no position superior to that of the mortgagor, Gould, and whatever interest he acquired by his purchase was subject and subordinate to the mortgage of plaintiff.

         Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Boyle Ice-Machine Co. v. Gould

Supreme Court of California
Jul 27, 1887
73 Cal. 153 (Cal. 1887)
Case details for

Boyle Ice-Machine Co. v. Gould

Case Details

Full title:BOYLE ICE MACHINE COMPANY, Respondent, v. C. B. GOULD et al. CARROLL COOK…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 27, 1887

Citations

73 Cal. 153 (Cal. 1887)
14 P. 609

Citing Cases

San Francisco Breweries v. Schurtz

All fixtures annexed to the leasehold interest are real property, and follow the leasehold interest as a…

People v. Church

While so attached a mortgage of the leasehold estate covers the fixtures, and on foreclosure they are sold as…