From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyes v. Smith

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 10, 2015
No. 67291 (Nev. Jun. 10, 2015)

Opinion

No. 67291

06-10-2015

TERRY DENHAM BOYES, Petitioner, v. GREGORY SMITH, WARDEN, NORTHERN NEVADA RESTITUTION CENTER; AND JAMES G. COX, DIRECTOR, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

Petitioner Terry Denham Boyes seeks a writ of mandamus directing respondents to assign him to the "305 program" for alcohol treatment and residential confinement pursuant to NRS 209.425 through NRS 209.429. Boyes asserts that he met the qualifications for the 305 program, and consequently, assignment to the 305 program was mandatory one year prior to his eligibility for parole pursuant to NRS 209.427(1). Boyes asserts that the Department of Corrections acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner when it determined that the timing for release is not one year prior to eligibility for parole, but rather one year prior to the mandatory parole release date.

The State represents that since the filing of the instant petition, Boyes resubmitted his application for the 305 program, it was approved and he was to be transported to the Department of Probation and Parole on April 29, 2015. Because Boyes has been assigned to the 305 program, the case is moot as this court is unable to grant effective relief. See Personhood Nev. v. Bristol, 126 Nev., Adv. Op. 56, 245 P.3d 572, 574 (2010) (recognizing that a case that initially presented a live controversy may be rendered moot by subsequent events). We conclude that Boyes' argument against dismissing the petition as moot is without merit as he has failed to demonstrate that the issue is likely to arise again and that the challenged action is too short in duration to be fully litigated prior to its natural expiration. See Stephens Media, LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 125 Nev. 849, 858, 221 P.3d 1240, 1247 (2009). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DISMISSED.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Pickering
cc: Law Office of Tammy M. Riggs, PLLC

Attorney General/Carson City


Summaries of

Boyes v. Smith

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 10, 2015
No. 67291 (Nev. Jun. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Boyes v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:TERRY DENHAM BOYES, Petitioner, v. GREGORY SMITH, WARDEN, NORTHERN NEVADA…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 10, 2015

Citations

No. 67291 (Nev. Jun. 10, 2015)