From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyce v. 228th Carpenter Ave. Holding Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 26, 1945
64 N.E.2d 282 (N.Y. 1945)

Opinion

Argued October 3, 1945

Decided October 26, 1945

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, MILLER, J.

Martin M. Kolbrener for appellant.

William J. Tropp for respondent.


Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs in all courts to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact for the jury as to whether or not at the place of the accident a condition of peculiar danger existed. No opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, THACHER, DYE and MEDALIE, JJ. Dissenting: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS and DESMOND, JJ.


Summaries of

Boyce v. 228th Carpenter Ave. Holding Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 26, 1945
64 N.E.2d 282 (N.Y. 1945)
Case details for

Boyce v. 228th Carpenter Ave. Holding Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EDITH BOYCE, Appellant, v. 228TH CARPENTER AVE. HOLDING CO., INC.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 26, 1945

Citations

64 N.E.2d 282 (N.Y. 1945)
64 N.E.2d 282

Citing Cases

Kimbar v. Estis

But that duty can be found nowhere in this case. First, there is clearly no applicable statutory duty as…

Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique

Pertinent, too, is the role which the landlord and tenant relationship plays in mitigating the concept of…