Opinion
No. SC06-1607.
January 31, 2007.
Lower Tribunal Nos.: 1D05-1302, 1D05-1394.
As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to reinstatement of case numbers 1D05-1302 and 1D05-1394, in the First District Court of Appeal, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).
"Petitioner's Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees and Costs" and other requests for relief are hereby denied.
WELLS, PARIENTE, QUINCE and CANTERO, JJ., concur.
ANSTEAD, J., would get additional responses by scheduling oral arguments.