From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boult v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 30, 1955
276 S.W.2d 815 (Tex. Crim. App. 1955)

Opinion

No. 27506.

March 30, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Henry Wade, Criminal Dist. Atty., Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Leon Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $125.

No statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record.

The judgment herein recites that the jail term was probated.

In compliance with the holding in Gilderbloom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 272 S.W.2d 106, the judgment herein is reformed so as to eliminate the provision for probation and, as reformed, is affirmed.


Summaries of

Boult v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 30, 1955
276 S.W.2d 815 (Tex. Crim. App. 1955)
Case details for

Boult v. State

Case Details

Full title:Patrick Kenneth BOULT, Appellant. v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 30, 1955

Citations

276 S.W.2d 815 (Tex. Crim. App. 1955)

Citing Cases

Coleman v. State

The first Adult Probation Law (Article 781b, V.A.C.C.P., 1925) permitted probation in misdemeanor cases. This…