From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boston v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Oct 8, 2019
591 S.W.3d 872 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107465

10-08-2019

Darran BOSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Ellen H. Flottman, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO. 65203, for appellant. Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.


Ellen H. Flottman, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO. 65203, for appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.

Before Mary K. Hoff, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The movant, Darran Boston, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

Boston v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Oct 8, 2019
591 S.W.3d 872 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Boston v. State

Case Details

Full title:Darran BOSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Oct 8, 2019

Citations

591 S.W.3d 872 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Citing Cases

Boston v. Ramey

the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief on the merits.…