From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boston v. Haynes

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1866
31 Cal. 107 (Cal. 1866)

Opinion


31 Cal. 107 WILLIAM W. BOSTON et al. v. THOMAS J. HAYNES et als. Supreme Court of California October, 1866

         Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco.

         Defendants recovered judgment in the Court below, and plaintiffs appealed.

         JUDGES: Sawyer, J.

         OPINION

          SAWYER, Judge

         The notice of appeal appears by the record to have been served on the 12th, and filed on the 13th of September, and respondents move to dismiss on that ground. It has often been held that the statute requires the filing to precede, or be contemporaneous with the service. The appellant's attorney seeks to obviate the objection by affidavit that the filing was, in fact, on the same day of the service; but this affidavit is met by a counter affidavit that the facts and the record correspond. If it were admissible, therefore, to contradict the record by affidavit, the appellant fails to satisfactorily show a mistake. But this Court must be governed by the record, as certified from the District Court. This Court has no authority to correct the records of the District Courts. If there is any error in the records of those Courts, the application to correct it must be made to the Court in the record of which the error exists. The record in this Court consists of a transcript of a record, or part of a record, of the Court of original jurisdiction, and we must be governed by the record as we find it.

         Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Boston v. Haynes

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1866
31 Cal. 107 (Cal. 1866)
Case details for

Boston v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM W. BOSTON et al. v. THOMAS J. HAYNES et als.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1866

Citations

31 Cal. 107 (Cal. 1866)

Citing Cases

People v. Schmitz

The order of service and filing of the notice of appeal on the same day is immaterial, the law disregarding…

Warren v. Hopkins

The better practice is to have the proof of such service made a part of the record in the court from which…