From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bos. Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 12, 2013
2012-1316 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2013)

Opinion

2012-1316

02-12-2013

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND SCIMED, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CORDIS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

YOUNG J. PARK, Fish & Richardson, P.C., of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. GREGORY L. DISKANT, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was EUGENE M. GELERNTER.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 10-CV-0315, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

JUDGMENT

YOUNG J. PARK, Fish & Richardson, P.C., of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellees.

GREGORY L. DISKANT, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was EUGENE M. GELERNTER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

____________________

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Bos. Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 12, 2013
2012-1316 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Bos. Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND SCIMED, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 12, 2013

Citations

2012-1316 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2013)

Citing Cases

Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Prods. Inc.

While BRP argues the rate impermissibly covers its profits, we have affirmed rates at or near the infringer's…