From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Born v. Perkins

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 26, 1918
119 N.E. 1031 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued March 13, 1918

Decided March 26, 1918

William Goldberg and Louis J. Rezzemini for appellants.

Borden H. Mills for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of WOODWARD, J., below.

Concur: CHASE, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: HISCOCK, Ch. J., and HOGAN, J.


Summaries of

Born v. Perkins

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 26, 1918
119 N.E. 1031 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Born v. Perkins

Case Details

Full title:WALLACE BORN et al., as Sole Heirs at Law of JAMES BORN, Deceased, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 26, 1918

Citations

119 N.E. 1031 (N.Y. 1918)
119 N.E. 1031

Citing Cases

Reichle v. Perkins

The parties had a right to make this agreement. ( Born v. Perkins, 173 App. Div. 214; affd., on the opinion…

Nagle v. Perkins

That case has no bearing whatsoever on the case at bar. In the case of Born v. Perkins ( 223 N.Y. 605) the…