From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borihane v. Outhouse

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 18, 2007
9:05-CV-1256 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2007)

Summary

following L.R. 7.1 and accepting statement of material facts as uncontroverted

Summary of this case from Reeder v. Bell

Opinion

9:05-CV-1256.

July 18, 2007

FOR THE PLAINTIFF: INTHANOUSONE BORIHANE, pro se.

FOR THE DEFENDANT: KENNETH M. ALWEIS, ESQ., SANDRA J. SABOURIN, ESQ., GOLDBERG SEGALLA, LLP, Syracuse, New York.


ORDER


The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles, duly filed on the 25th day of June, 2007. Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is

ORDERED, that:

1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby approved.

2. The defendant's motion seeking the entry of summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint against him (Dkt. No. 22) is granted, and the plaintiff's complaint is dismissed in all respects on the basis of mootness.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Borihane v. Outhouse

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 18, 2007
9:05-CV-1256 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2007)

following L.R. 7.1 and accepting statement of material facts as uncontroverted

Summary of this case from Reeder v. Bell
Case details for

Borihane v. Outhouse

Case Details

Full title:INTHANOUSONE BORIHANE, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT OUTHOUSE, Sheriff, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jul 18, 2007

Citations

9:05-CV-1256 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2007)

Citing Cases

Rosales v. Wright

Accord Thompson v. Carter, 284 F.3d 411, 415 (2d Cir. 2002); Borihane v. Outhouse No. 9:05-CV-1256, 2007 WL…

Reeder v. Bell

Courts in this district have found it appropriate to enforce L.R. 7.1(a)(3) and its predecessor L.R. 7.1(f),…