From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borgman v. Lassahn

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Nov 10, 1938
2 A.2d 440 (Md. 1938)

Opinion

[No. 37, October Term, 1938.]

Decided November 10th, 1938.

Life Tenant — Power of Sale — Exercise for Nominal Consideration.

The owner of property who, by a conveyance and reconveyance, constituted himself life tenant thereof, with remainder to his son, reserving to himself a power to sell, lease, mortgage, and incumber in any manner the absolute estate therein, including both the life estate and the remainder, could thereafter, on the death of the son named as remainderman, by a conveyance and reconveyance for a nominal consideration, again become life tenant, with remainder to another son, the exercise of the power reserved not requiring the support of an actual consideration.

Evidence of declarations by the original owner, afterwards life tenant, that his purpose in having the title changed was to substitute another remainderman for the son who had died, was properly excluded, it being irrelevant to the exercise of the reserved legal right.

Decided November 10th, 1938.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (DENNIS, C.J.).

Bill by Vernon Borgman, infant, by Helen Borgman, now Helen Tworek, his mother, guardian, and next friend, against Matilda A. Lassahn and others. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., URNER, OFFUTT, PARKE, MITCHELL, SHEHAN, and JOHNSON, JJ.

David Ash, with whom were Charles Jackson and Mark Jackson on the brief, for the appellant.

John J. Timanus, Daniel S. Sullivan, and Daniel S. Sullivan, Jr., submitting on brief, for the appellees.


Unreported cases.


Summaries of

Borgman v. Lassahn

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Nov 10, 1938
2 A.2d 440 (Md. 1938)
Case details for

Borgman v. Lassahn

Case Details

Full title:VERNON BORGMAN v . MATILDA LASSAHN ET AL

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Nov 10, 1938

Citations

2 A.2d 440 (Md. 1938)
2 A.2d 440

Citing Cases

In re Yelton: Advisory Opinion

At any rate, opposite conclusions have been reached in the different States with variant reasons assigned…