From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borgess Medical Center v. Resto

Supreme Court of Michigan
Aug 1, 2008
482 Mich. 946 (Mich. 2008)

Opinion


754 N.W.2d 321 (Mich. 2008) 482 Mich. 946 BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan RESTO, Defendant, and Southern Michigan Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 133223. COA No. 270773. Supreme Court of Michigan. August 1, 2008

          By order of October 3, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in Ross v. Auto Club Group (Docket No. 130917). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on May 7, 2008, 481 Mich. 1, 748 N.W.2d 552 (2008), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the majority opinion in Borgess Medical Center v. Resto, 273 Mich.App. 558, 730 N.W.2d 738 (2007), and AFFIRM the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion. The motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae by Phu Tran et al. is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Borgess Medical Center v. Resto

Supreme Court of Michigan
Aug 1, 2008
482 Mich. 946 (Mich. 2008)
Case details for

Borgess Medical Center v. Resto

Case Details

Full title:BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan RESTO, Defendant, and…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Aug 1, 2008

Citations

482 Mich. 946 (Mich. 2008)
482 Mich. 946

Citing Cases

Wyo. Chiropractic Health Clinic, PC v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.

Therefore, this Court cannot rely on the majority opinion in Resto I.Borgess Med. Ctr. v. Resto, 273…

Wyo. Chiropractic Health Clinic, PC v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.

Therefore, this Court cannot rely on the majority opinion in Resto I.Borgess Med. Ctr. v. Resto, 273…