From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borelli v. Gegaj

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 1998
248 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 26, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, J.).


Supreme Court properly denied defendants' motion for summary judgment as untimely since they failed to file their motion within 120 days after the effective date of the amendment to CPLR 3212 (a) and failed to establish "good cause" for the delay (L 1996, ch 492; Phoenix Garden Rest. v. Chu, 245 A.D.2d 164; Rodriguez v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 246 A.D.2d 174).

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Borelli v. Gegaj

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 1998
248 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Borelli v. Gegaj

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BORELLI, Respondent, v. PJETTER GEGAJ et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 26, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 90

Citing Cases

Brill v. City of New York

Since the belated summary judgment motion was clearly meritorious, and plaintiffs were not prejudiced by the…

Shmulevich v. Gabbidon

CPLR 3212 (a), as amended effective January 1, 1997, requires a motion for summary judgment to be made within…