From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patton v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 13, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-902 SECTION P (W.D. La. Apr. 13, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-902 SECTION P

04-13-2015

ERNEST PATTON BOP #06498-112 v. C. MAIORANA


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein and after an independent review of the record, and a de novo determination of the issues, and consideration of the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law; it is

ORDERED THAT the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the court lacks jurisdiction to consider these claims.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, Lake Charles, Louisiana, on this 13th day of April, 2015.

/s/ _________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Patton v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 13, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-902 SECTION P (W.D. La. Apr. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Patton v. Maiorana

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST PATTON BOP #06498-112 v. C. MAIORANA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Apr 13, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-902 SECTION P (W.D. La. Apr. 13, 2015)

Citing Cases

Nix v. United States

Even so, numerous courts to have considered this issue have held that Rosemond does not apply retroactively.…