From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boozer v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 3, 1980
155 Ga. App. 525 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

59961.

SUBMITTED JUNE 16, 1980.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 3, 1980.

Aggravated assault. Richmond Superior Court. Before Judge Pierce.

Percy J. Blount, for appellant.

Richard E. Allen, District Attorney, W. Leon Barfield, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The defendant appeals his conviction of aggravated assault. The defendant was accused of shooting one Donna Williams. The doctor who treated the victim stated that the wounds inflicted on her head were apparently caused by a shotgun or "scatter gun." The victim stated at 3:30 a. m. she heard a man, standing on the front porch of the house where she lived, say: "Unless Linda came out he would set the house on fire." The victim's mother stated that a man who identified himself by the accused's name made the same threat and others. Another witness testified that the accused was the person on the front porch and he had a "sawed-off" shotgun. Shortly thereafter, the victim was struck by a shot through the window. None of the witnesses saw who fired the shot. Held:

The evidence, although circumstantial, was sufficient so that a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Stinson v. State, 244 Ga. 219 (4) ( 259 S.E.2d 471). See Hunter v. State, 10 Ga. App. 831 ( 74 S.E. 553); Barnes v. State, 245 Ga. 609 ( 266 S.E.2d 212). Judgment affirmed. Shulman and Carley, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED JUNE 16, 1980 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 3, 1980.


Summaries of

Boozer v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 3, 1980
155 Ga. App. 525 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Boozer v. State

Case Details

Full title:BOOZER v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 3, 1980

Citations

155 Ga. App. 525 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
271 S.E.2d 675

Citing Cases

Woodliff v. State

We find the evidence presented was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact of the guilt of the…

Green v. State

We find this evidence sufficient to support Green’s convictions under the standard set forth in Jackson v.…