From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Booze v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Feb 13, 2007
919 A.2d 561 (Del. 2007)

Summary

explaining that the record reflects that the prosecutor's statement in closing "was a reasonable inference that can be drawn from the evidence presented at trial and was not a false statement or misrepresentation of fact"

Summary of this case from Banther v. State

Opinion

No. 90, 2006.

February 13, 2007.

Appeal from the Superior (Sussex) Cr 0412002779.


Decisions Without Published Opinions AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Booze v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Feb 13, 2007
919 A.2d 561 (Del. 2007)

explaining that the record reflects that the prosecutor's statement in closing "was a reasonable inference that can be drawn from the evidence presented at trial and was not a false statement or misrepresentation of fact"

Summary of this case from Banther v. State
Case details for

Booze v. State

Case Details

Full title:Booze v. State

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Feb 13, 2007

Citations

919 A.2d 561 (Del. 2007)

Citing Cases

Reyes v. State

See, e.g., Spence v. State, 129 A.3d 212, 227 (Del. 2015) (holding that a sentence in the State's PowerPoint…

White v. State

Id.Id. (citation omitted) (citing Booze v. State , 919 A.2d 561, 2007 WL 445969, at *4 (Del. Feb. 13, 2007)…