From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Booker v. Jabe

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Sep 26, 1986
801 F.2d 871 (6th Cir. 1986)

Opinion

No. 83-1136.

Argued September 20, 1984.

Decided September 26, 1986.

On remand from the Supreme Court.

Chari Grove argued, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner-appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen. of Mich., Eric J. Eggan, Edgar L. Church, Jr. argued, Asst. Atty. Gen., Corrections Div., Lansing, Mich., for respondent-appellee.

Before MERRITT and JONES, Circuit Judges; and BELL, District Judge.

The Honorable Samuel H. Bell, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.


This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court "for further consideration in light of Allen v. Hardy, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 2878, 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986) and Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986)." Michigan v. Booker, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 3289, 92 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986). We have reviewed those decisions and have determined that they do not affect our disposition of Booker v. Jabe, 775 F.2d 762 (6th Cir. 1985).

We therefore reinstate our previous opinion and judgment.


Summaries of

Booker v. Jabe

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Sep 26, 1986
801 F.2d 871 (6th Cir. 1986)
Case details for

Booker v. Jabe

Case Details

Full title:LARRY BOOKER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JOHN JABE, WARDEN, KINROSS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Sep 26, 1986

Citations

801 F.2d 871 (6th Cir. 1986)

Citing Cases

U.S. ex Rel. Yates v. Hardiman

The Circuit Courts of Appeals considering the issue have reached conflicting conclusions. The Second and…

United States v. Mosely

Furthermore, discriminatory use of the peremptory challenge to strike venirepersons solely on the basis of…