From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Book v. Merski

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 30, 2009
C.A. No. 08-83 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2009)

Opinion

C.A. No. 08-83 Erie.

March 30, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on February 23, 2009, recommended that Defendants Bob Merski and Deputy Sheriffs One and Two Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) be granted. The parties were permitted to file objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation by March 12, 2009. Service was made on all parties. No objections were filed. Afterde novo review of the Complaint (Doc. 3), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) and Brief in Support (Doc. 11) and Plaintiff's response thereto (Doc. 13), the following order is entered.

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2009, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) is GRANTED.

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on February 23, 2009 (Doc. 25) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Book v. Merski

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 30, 2009
C.A. No. 08-83 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Book v. Merski

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW BOOK, Plaintiff v. BOB MERSKI, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 30, 2009

Citations

C.A. No. 08-83 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Savidge v. Donahoe

"The burden then shifts to the non-movant to come forward with specific facts showing a genuine issue for…

Riviello v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union

"The burden then shifts to the non-movant to come forward with specific facts showing a genuine issue for…