From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonnie Company Fashions v. Bankers Trust

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 1999
262 A.D.2d 188 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Summary

finding complaint raised issues of fact regarding defendant's possible breach of obligation of good faith and fair dealing

Summary of this case from Universal Comp., Inc. v. Tidewater

Opinion

June 22, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.).


The IAS Court erred in its dismissal of plaintiffs' first, second and fourth causes of action. On a pre-answer motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), a dismissal is proper only when the documentary evidence submitted establishes a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law ( Leon v. Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 88). The opposing party needs only to assert facts which "fit within any cognizable legal theory" ( Leon v. Martinez, supra, at 87-88). Plaintiffs' allegations regarding the timing and method of terminating the Factoring Agreement and refusing to honor Letters of Credit prior to expiration of the period, without any showing by defendant that plaintiffs had breached the Factoring Agreement in any way, raise issues of fact regarding whether Bankers Trust Company breached its obligation of good faith and fair dealing to plaintiffs ( see, Advanced Safety Sys. v. Manufacturers Traders Trust Co., 188 A.D.2d 1009; Components Direct v. European Am. Bank Trust Co., 175 A.D.2d 227). As such, the first cause of action should be reinstated. Similarly, plaintiffs' second cause of action should be reinstated as there are issues of fact outstanding regarding whether the telefax of the notice of termination to Hong Kong, to an entity which plaintiffs claim was an "affiliate", was a breach of the Factoring Agreement; a provision in section 4 of the agreement sets forth the mailing address of plaintiff's chief place of business and the office at which all books and records were maintained. Further, the complaint sets forth sufficient facts to raise the issue of whether the individual plaintiff suffered consequential damages as a result of defendant's alleged improper withholding of her collateral, at least from the time that the Bank was repaid its debt in or around 1990.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Bonnie Company Fashions v. Bankers Trust

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 1999
262 A.D.2d 188 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

finding complaint raised issues of fact regarding defendant's possible breach of obligation of good faith and fair dealing

Summary of this case from Universal Comp., Inc. v. Tidewater
Case details for

Bonnie Company Fashions v. Bankers Trust

Case Details

Full title:BONNIE COMPANY FASHIONS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. BANKERS TRUST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 188 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
693 N.Y.S.2d 19

Citing Cases

Castro v. 120 Broadway Holdings, LLC

When determining a CPLR 3211(a) motion, "we liberally construe the complaint and accept as true the facts…

Café Amore of N.Y. Rest. Inc. v. IG Second Generation Partners, L.P.

"On a pre-answer motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), a dismissal is proper only when the…