From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonilla v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 23, 2009
23 So. 3d 1256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Summary

certifying direct conflict with Montgomery

Summary of this case from Leggett v. State

Opinion

No. 3D09-3209.

December 23, 2009.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction — Habeas Corpus.

Rodrigo Bonilla, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for respondent.

Before GERSTEN, SUAREZ, and SALTER, JJ.

Prior report: 19 So.3d 431.


We deny the defendant's petition for writ of habeas corpus arguing ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. However, to preserve the defendant's rights, we certify direct conflict with Montgomery v. State, ___ So.3d ___, 2009 WL 350624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), which is currently pending review before the Florida Supreme Court. State v. Montgomery, 11 So.3d 943 (Fla. 2009).

Habeas corpus denied; conflict certified.


Summaries of

Bonilla v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 23, 2009
23 So. 3d 1256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

certifying direct conflict with Montgomery

Summary of this case from Leggett v. State
Case details for

Bonilla v. State

Case Details

Full title:Rodrigo BONILLA, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 23, 2009

Citations

23 So. 3d 1256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Leggett v. State

The Valdes-Pino panel followed Zeigler v. State, 18 So.3d 1239 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), and certified direct…

Solano v. State

This court has certified conflict with Montgomery, and has instead followed the Second District's decision in…