From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonifer v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 2005
17 A.D.3d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-05840.

April 11, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), dated June 8, 2004, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Simmons, Jannace Stagg, LLP, East Meadow, N.Y. (William T. Collins III of counsel), for appellant.

Ferro, Kuba, Bloom, Mangano, Gacavino Lake, P.C., Sayville, N.Y. (Claudia L. Behmoiram of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Adams, J.P., S. Miller, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant failed to make out a prima facie case entitling it to judgment as a matter of law ( see O'Leary v. Bravo Hylan, LLC, 8 AD3d 542; Katz v. PRO Form Fitness, 3 AD3d 474, 475; Kucera v. Walbaums Supermarkets, 304 AD2d 531, 532). Thus, it is not necessary to examine the sufficiency of the plaintiff's opposing papers ( see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851).


Summaries of

Bonifer v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 2005
17 A.D.3d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Bonifer v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THERESA BONIFER, Respondent, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 11, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
792 N.Y.S.2d 355

Citing Cases

Worldwide Asset Purchasing, LLC v. Karafotias

Moreover, even in the absence of opposition, a motion for summary judgment may be granted only if the movant…