From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boney v. Tims

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 5, 1985
333 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. 1985)

Summary

reviewing State's appeal of habeas corpus proceeding in which court declared defendant's sentences null and void and ordered resentencing

Summary of this case from In re Interest of D. B.

Opinion

42023.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1985.

Habeas corpus. Lee Superior Court. Before Judge Gibson.

Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Eddie Snelling, Jr., Staff Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

J. Kelley Quillian, for appellee.


Michael Anthony Tims was convicted of the offenses of kidnapping and armed robbery. Tims' convictions were affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Tims v. State, 168 Ga. App. 409 ( 309 S.E.2d 405) (1983). In a subsequent habeas corpus proceeding, Tims' sentences were declared null and void and resentencing was ordered. The state appeals.

The circumstances surrounding the offenses for which Tims was convicted are set out in the Court of Appeals' affirmance thereof, id. at 409-410, and will only be repeated here in relevant part. In the late evening hours of February 27, 1982, in Fulton County, Tims stepped into the victim's car and forced her to drive away at gunpoint. While still in Fulton County, Tims robbed the victim of her jewelry and ordered her to drive to a cemetery in DeKalb County. At the DeKalb County cemetery he forced the victim to stop the car, get out, and take off her clothes. The victim began to scream, prompting Tims to threaten her by placing the barrel of his gun in her mouth. Tims then allegedly forced her to sodomize him. After this attack Tims released the victim. Since the kidnapping and robbery took place in Fulton County, Tims was tried and convicted of those offenses there. DeKalb County, however, never brought charges against Tims for sodomy.

In the Fulton County pre-sentencing hearing, the judge asked the assistant district attorney if there was evidence of aggravation. The assistant district attorney responded by referring to the DeKalb County sodomy, and then requested that Tims receive fifteen years for the kidnapping charge. The judge sentenced Tims to serve ten years for kidnapping, and to serve a consecutive term of ten years for armed robbery.

Tims sought a writ of habeas corpus in the Superior Court of Lee County, on the ground that the trial judge improperly considered the evidence of sodomy in setting his sentence. The habeas court agreed that this crime, which was committed in another county, was improperly considered in sentencing Tims for crimes which he committed in Fulton County. The court declared Tims' sentences null and void and ordered resentencing.

The state contends that the trial court did not err in considering the DeKalb County sodomy when it sentenced Tims for the crimes committed in Fulton County. We agree. In determining what sentence to impose upon a defendant, a trial court may consider any evidence that was properly admitted during the guilt-innocence phase of the trial. Dorsey v. Willis, 242 Ga. 316 ( 249 S.E.2d 28) (1978). In the instant case, the evidence of the DeKalb County sodomy was admissible during the guilt-innocence phase of Tims' trial, as "[t]he state is entitled to inform the jury of all the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime or crimes charged. . . ." Chambers v. State, 250 Ga. 856, 859 (2) ( 302 S.E.2d 86) (1983). Since the sodomy evidence was properly admitted as part of the res gestae of the kidnapping and robbery, the trial court did not err in considering it when setting Tims' sentence for the Fulton County crimes. To the extent that Minis v. State, 150 Ga. App. 671, 673 (5) ( 258 S.E.2d 308) (1979), is inconsistent with this opinion, it is hereby overruled.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except Gregory, J., who concurs in the judgment only.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1985.


Summaries of

Boney v. Tims

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 5, 1985
333 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. 1985)

reviewing State's appeal of habeas corpus proceeding in which court declared defendant's sentences null and void and ordered resentencing

Summary of this case from In re Interest of D. B.

In Boney v. Tims, 254 Ga. 664 (333 S.E.2d 592) (1985), the Supreme Court held that "[i]n determining what sentence to impose on a defendant, a trial court may consider any evidence that was properly admitted during the guilt-innocence phase of the trial.

Summary of this case from McClain v. State
Case details for

Boney v. Tims

Case Details

Full title:BONEY v. TIMS

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 5, 1985

Citations

333 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. 1985)
333 S.E.2d 592

Citing Cases

White v. State

1. Citing Minis v. State, 150 Ga. App. 671, 673 (5) ( 258 S.E.2d 308) (1979), appellant urges that crimes for…

Watkins v. State

Appellant objected to the use of any information regarding the incident, arguing to the effect that "a…